Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gita Records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gita Records[edit]

Gita Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a record label, citing no reliable sources to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH, and not even really making any notability claim at all except releasing one album by a non-notable artist which had notable session musicians on it. But that's not an automatic pass of our notability standards for record labels -- a notability claim has to be properly referenced, not just asserted, before it actually translates into a reason for a Wikipedia article. There's also a direct conflict of interest here, as the creator's username corresponds to the name of the non-notable artist. Bearcat (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Source searches are providing no significant coverage in reliable sources; fails WP:N. North America1000 02:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - non notable record label. I could find no reliable, independent sources that gave any sort of information from which to build a verifiable article. No evident cultural or musical influence. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No reliable sources. ElAhrairah inspect damageberate 19:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.