Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gishiri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The issue of redirecting can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gishiri[edit]
- Gishiri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is a desambiguation page for pages with does not directly use the word to be accessed. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 19:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It a perfectly reasonable disambig page. Peacock (talk) 19:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep You could've just, you know, fixed that instead of going the extra mile to chuck this on AFD. The page has now been properly fixed, making the nom's argument moot. Agent VodelloOK, Let's Party, Darling! 21:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Gishiri Cutting (which BTW should be renamed Gishiri cutting). Wikipedia is not a dictionary (much less a Hausa one), so that rules out the first entry. The only other one is a redlinked village. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as disambiguation page. --Dia^ (talk) 16:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as per Clarityfiend. Dabbing pages that may mean words in other languages doesn't hae a precedent as far as I know. If the article for that village is created, then a hatnote can be used. sonia♫ 07:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.