Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girl and the Sea
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Staxringold talkcontribs 00:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Girl and the Sea[edit]
- Girl and the Sea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:MUSIC Crotchety Old Man (talk) 19:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - How does this fail notability? The first line of the second paragraph of WP:NALBUMS: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." It's not a single track single, and has even had one song played in The O.C.. I would think that gives it more than enough notability. -WarthogDemon 19:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Since the band is notable and a track from the EP has been used in a major TV series, I see no good reason to delete this. I found plenty of mentions of this EP where it was described, for example, as "pristine melancholy".--Michig (talk) 08:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC) See this and this for instance.--Michig (talk) 08:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, ignoring the fact that it looks as though it has been set up wrong (ie as the single), as the 2004 released EP it passes WP:Albums for the info Michig has dug up. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 12:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per Michig. Joe Chill (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per sources found by User:Michig, would appear to meet criteria #1 of WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.