Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni sacheli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni sacheli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable professor or businessman. A search failed to find any significant coverage about him or his companies. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist ^talk|contribs 11:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. We neither have evidence of WP:PROF nor WP:GNG notability, and we have zero independent sourcing. Given the puffery often associated with search engine optimization people, relying only on primary sources is particularly concerning. I note, for instance, that our article calls him a "professor" at FUS, but that fails verification: his profile there, conveniently not linked from our article, merely calls him a consultant. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.