Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni Mazza

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With restoration and salting of original redirect. The Bushranger One ping only 01:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giovanni Mazza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for what seems to be a little more then a very z grade extra. More notable it seems for playing at half time shows then his acting career. Slatersteven (talk) 19:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. J947 (c · m) 00:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. J947 (c · m) 00:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. J947 (c · m) 00:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. J947 (c · m) 00:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. J947 (c · m) 00:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. J947 (c · m) 00:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • How can IP make case here? The case is not worthy of this subpage and unnecessary logs it now generated. Now this will close as delete and the redirect will definitely be restored (it is original name of Gianni Mazza). What the IP will do is to simply turn it again to article, you can understand why your decision is not best here. But if you had reverted him and request semi-protection of the redirect, that's the easiest and the most effective way of dealing with that. This doesn't mean you acted in bad faith, but I hope you'll understand why this AfD is unnecessary. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a BLP nightmare. At first I was going to say it was problematic that the first of three paragraphs only took us to when he was 10, but considering he is only 12, it is not that bad. Performing in a half-time show as a musician does not generally propel someone to notability. There is no sign of notability, and considering we should respect the privacy of minors, especially those who are not even teenagers, this article needs to be deleted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.