Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginny McQueen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete uncontested --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ginny McQueen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet notability guidelines, lack of reliable sources. Has been a stub since 2009, hasn't been substantially altered or updated since then.

Delete Per WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 23:00, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards.Knox490 (talk) 01:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If there was ever an article that made Wikipedia look like it was over focused on the interests of nerds and geeks it was this one, without showing attention to reliable source coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.