Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilbert Classical Academy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 04:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gilbert Classical Academy[edit]

I read Wikipedia:OUTCOMES#Education to say that decisions on schools are hard and they shouldn't be speedied, so removing from db-spam queue and taking to AfD. I deleted some of the paragraphs. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 06:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, they're not usually deleted under the A7 criterion because it's controversial. There's no reason not to apply G11 or G12 when it blatantly applies. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I just said the same thing on my talk page. G12 (copyvio) always, and I'd db-spam a particularly slick promotional piece for a private school if I couldn't find any evidence of notability. But if some kid is writing about their school, I take WP:OUTCOMES#Education to mean that it's probably not my call whether to delete or not; so far that's what I'm hearing from other admins, but tell me if you know of "safe" guidelines. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 14:25, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 06:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 06:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep as amended. Original article was total spam, almost like an ad. {Sorry, not aware that education establishments are not normally speedied.)--Dmol (talk) 07:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge to the school district. There is not enough information to warrant a separate article. Also, no independent sources, means no independent article. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for my usual reasons. Secondary schools are significant places. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - high school for which sources are available for suitable expansion. Such pages should be improved not deleted. TerriersFan (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How is that comment relevant to this article? There are no such sources. If you can find some, you should mention them in your comment. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.