Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gigmaven (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gigmaven[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article created by SPA. A single RS-ish cite; no evidence of notability otherwise. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of WP:CORPDEPTH to meet WP:CORP, WP:GNG or any other notability guideline. There's no evidence this company has ever been notable. David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There doesn't appear to be enough out there to satisfy WP:NCORP. XOR'easter (talk) 16:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP lacks significant news coverage. Rickshaw Takahashi (talk) 05:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.