Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibson Southern Marching Titans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gibson Southern Marching Titans[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is an unnecessary content fork about the school's marching band, which in and of itself is not notable beyond the school. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to HS page...NN, fails WP:GNG CTJF83 chat 05:09, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 1 gnews hit [1]. 07:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. Reywas92^Talk 03:01, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, then recreate as redirect to Gibson Southern High School, since redirects are cheap. tedder (talk) 19:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this doesn't seem to even approach Notability. I don't see any way for the article to become compliant with our inclusion criteria. The Wordsmith^Communicate 21:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've had a few interesting comments left on my talk page about this nomination, one of which noted this is the third attempt to delete the page, though there is no record of previous AfD's. Just in case it comes up: there was an attempt to merge and redirect the article to the school article some years ago, which was undone. The article was later prodded for deletion. The prod was removed, and the article never stood at AfD for discussion. As far as I can tell, this is the first time the community has stood in judgement of the article. LonelyBeacon (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.