Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gianna Michaels (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clearly meets PORNBIO. Spartaz Humbug! 18:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gianna Michaels[edit]

Gianna Michaels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails current WP:PORNBIO requirements. Pax 03:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:18, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The article lists an AVN Unsung Starlet win, but the citation doesn't include a full name. If verified, the win would satisfy the letter of WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gene93k, The Gianna who received AVN's Unsung Starlet of the Year award in 2008 is definitely Gianna Michaels. Rebecca1990 (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - winner of many awards. Subtropical-man talk
    (en-2)
    14:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. She has won many awards, some of which are individual. Subject thus definitely passes WP:PORNBIO requirements. -- fdewaele, 20 April 2015, 18:33
  • Keep. Her AVN Award for Unsung Starlet of the Year satisfies WP:PORNBIO #1. Rebecca1990 (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.