Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostwriter, Brent J. Cole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ghostwriter, Brent J. Cole[edit]

Delete. Non-notable. Article is written by the subject. A google search for "Brent J. Cole" turns up a whopping four hits: two of which are Wikipedia links, one of which is presumably the subject's own website and the last one being a ZoomInfo page. CyberGhostface (talk) 18:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Same as CyberGhostface. תחי מדינת ישראל (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vain vanity in vain JuJube (talk) 00:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as NN, self-promotion article. If this is kept, it needs to be renamed "Brent J. Cole" to conform with article naming policy. 23skidoo (talk) 12:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BIO and WP:A. The subject is not notable, and none of the biography is referenced. How notable can a ghostwriter ever be, when all the books bear the moniker of someone else? Ohconfucius (talk) 04:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Non-notable writer who posted an article about himself and then proceeded to edit war by vandalizing all of the AUTO and COI and deletion tags. Oh, let's see: WP:single-purpose account, WP:EDITWAR, WP:BK, WP:BIO, WP:RS, WP:VSCA, WP:NOTINHERITED, WP:AUTO, WP:COI, WP:SNOW. Qworty (talk) 09:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.