Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghosts In The Machines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ghosts In The Machines[edit]

The result of the debate was Speedy delete per CSD A3. The article has been purged of all unverifiable content, leaving the article literarely empty. Consensus to delete is clear as well. — Edokter • Talk • 22:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTALBALL. I cannot find any official confirmation that this is the name of the Christmas Special, nor any sources that back up the facts shown this page. It is pure speculation, about an episode that is still six months away. _Talk Islander 19:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no proof of the title or the content, and there is already a Torchwood episode entitled "Ghost Machine" (which makes this title even less likely). --Ckatz^chat _spy 19:21, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I feel like screaming at something. This name seems to come from nowhere, it is not in the fifth series anyway (but the between-series specials), and this Metro fact is probably absolute rubbish. U-Mos (talk) 19:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Stephenb (Talk) 19:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question What should be done when articles that are blatantly going to be deleted disobey capitalisation conventions? Is there any point moving it to Ghosts in the Machines? U-Mos (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is totally WP:CRYSTAL. No reliable sources (just the mention that an actor on the show mentioned it, but there's no link for proof). I can't find anything about it anywhere else. It also fails per WP:V Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 20:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Is there any point continuing this? I know that technically this article doesn't violate any of WP:CSD, but anyone think this can be closed per WP:SNOW? Unless a rock-solid source can back up the existance of this title, it will stay as speculation. _Talk Islander 20:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reliable source, and even filming won't even start for at least a month. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 21:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.