Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost of Your Ex-Boyfriend Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost of Your Ex-Boyfriend Productions[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by an IP back in 2005, this is either a hoax or a very obscure production company. Adam9007 (talk) 02:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's not a hoax, but it is fairly obscure and I'm not entirely convinced of its notability. As the article content states, it was a joint production company formed by John Safran and Richard Lowenstein. As far as I know the company produced just two TV series: John Safran's Music Jamboree and John Safran vs. God in 2003. Forming an ephemeral production company for the production of one or two films or series is quite common, and while the production itself might be notable, the company would not be in many cases. --Canley (talk) 03:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to John Safran vs. God, as there's nothing to suggest better independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I can't see this being kept, but if a redirect is to be considered, John Safran may be the best choice considering it was used for 2 of his shows. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I incorporated a short sentence to make note of this in John Safran vs God article, but clearly not notable on it's own. Aeonx (talk) 23:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable on it's own. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 01:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not a hoax as showsn by this, but there is no coverage about this production company at all. - Whpq (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.