Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost of Dead Aeroplanes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 07:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost of Dead Aeroplanes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NMUSIC. Kleuske (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Ha, well, this album has more coverage, as it was four years further into the Internet age: CMJ, AllMusic, Drowned in Sound, Boston Phoenix, to start. Interested to hear what other editors think. Caro7200 (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Unfortunately I misspelled the name of the album when creating the initial link, and it should be Ghosts of Dead Aeroplanes. The band and album where wildly covered in printed UK/Europe press at the time, sadly those sources don't appear to be online. Missbarbell (talk) 15:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missbarbell, sorry, didn't notice that you had just created these, should have paid more attention. My opinion is that they should not have been nominated so quickly. Caro7200 (talk) 16:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I assume that nomination for deletion to 'Academics and educators' was a mistake? Missbarbell (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Prolapse (band)#Discography per Kleuske.—S Marshall T/C 17:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Caro7200. I found album reviews from CMJ, Slow Thrills and Tom Francis. I believe those sources, including the ones from NM and Drowned in Sound, are reliable enough for the article to pass WP:GNG. My vote stands. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 02:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:10, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, this source here shows it meets criteria 1 of WP:NALBUM. Apollo825 ^{- talk to me baby -} 17:27, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources identified by Superastig. — Toughpigs (talk) 19:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.