Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Lights (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Lights (band)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially-tinged article about a musician with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and no strong reliable source coverage. The notability claims here are that an EP exists and that it has "seen some radio airtime" -- but "notable just because the music exists" requires at least two full albums on major labels, not one independent EP on Bandcamp, and "notable because radio airplay" requires a reliable source to verify that they got playlisted by a national radio network, not just generically unverifiable claims of "some radio airtime". As for the sourcing, every single footnote here is either a primary source or a blog, and not even one of them is a notability-supporting reliable source. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a notable band per nominators recommendations. Lubbad85 (☎) 22:43, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.