Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 20:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Hotel[edit]

Disputed prod. Non-notable film. Six minutes long and filmed in a single day. No reliable sources. No notable participants. nancy ^talk 13:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy, if i can improve this article, can you remove the tag you have set on it. --MKV2 (talk) 13:46, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you can show that the films meets the notability criteria for films then the article will be kept. This debate will run for five days and I encourage you participate in it. The most helpful thing you could do with the article is to provide independent reliable secondary sources to verify Ghost Hotel's notability, the problem at the moment is that all the references both cited in the article and otherwise available on the web are self-published. nancy ^talk 15:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Completely fails WP:MOVIE. Hqb (talk) 14:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 18:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of any notability whatsoever. Only references are YouTube, and there are no google hits outside wikipedia [1]. PC78 (talk) 18:17, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Youtube profiles are not reliable sources. Keep looking... Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.