Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghatiya YouTube Channel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghatiya YouTube Channel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was declined. Clearly not notable as absolutely no reliable source coverage. Article was created by an SPA as a likely COI. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 12:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 12:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 12:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 12:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with the nom as the page fails WP:GNG as the sources provided are not reliable. The only source which could be considered reliable (social blade) does not even mention the channel. Nothing comes up when searching for the page. Another problem with the page is that they link their social media which under WP:ELNO is not allowed. Finally as the nom suggests, there might be a conflict of interest as to who wrote the page based on the information provided CreativeNorth (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional spam. I agree that declining PROD was a poor decision. TheodoreIndiana (talk) 06:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete :per nom -- Padavalam ► 13:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, definitely WP:TOOSOON. Sources aren't the best. EverybodyEdits (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Promotional rubbish. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the channel or the owner. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete One of the least notable subjects I've seen on Wikipedia so far.★Trekker (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Per nom. I can't even remotely imagine a 1K subscriber channel meeting notability standards. Some WP:SOCKING in the edit history as well. Jumpytoo Talk 05:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.