Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Rich Slowly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Get Rich Slowly[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another one like The Next Web or YourStory. Made for Promotions by promotions alone and nothing else. High degree of promotions. Article itself cites Once in a lifetime coverage by popular media as grand achievement they have made. Clearly influenced by blog people and nothing else. Light2021 (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO; an unremarkable web site affiliated with a non notable entity J.D. Roth. No value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom apart from the cited sources being literally two op-ed mentions, WP:BEFORE for me brings up the actual phrase and nothing about the company in RSes - David Gerard (talk) 10:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.