Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gesiel Theodoro da Silva
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 21:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Gesiel Theodoro da Silva[edit]
- Gesiel Theodoro da Silva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-Notable Stellatomailing 02:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unknown author. 18 Ghits, all trivial. Stellatomailing 02:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Although he has published a volume of works, the article fails to assert his importance - what impact his books have had, any awards, no references. I did run a google search on his name and the results were scant. Ozgod 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are very few Google results, still fewer when removing the Wikipedia mirrors. Furthermore, the two external links in the article make no mention of this author so there is no reliable source for the information in the article. Fails notability. Will (aka Wimt) 02:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment could this be a spoof? When I read the name quickly, it brought to mind Theodore Seuss Geisel. Chris 06:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a spoof :-) Stellatomailing 15:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletions. -- Stellatomailing 17:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This time WorldCat did list one book, "Madre Paulina" One library has it: Univ. of São Paolo. Apparently unrecognized in his native country. We have fewer resources for detecting vanity publications when they're not in English. DGG 04:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.