Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerry (company)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerry (company)[edit]

Gerry (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. ubiquity (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 15:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the one name is not helping but I have simply found nothing actually better, nothing currently to suggest a solidly acceptable notable article. SwisterTwister talk 07:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Keep, speaking as one of the thousands of parents who carried babies in "Gerry carriers" in the 1960s. It was certainly a well-known company then. The company was a pioneer in modernizing outdoor gear and made the tents Edmond Hillary slept in while climbing Everest. Sources for older companies are a problem but I will add what I find to the article. StarryGrandma (talk) 01:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - No compelling case made by nom or other editors for delete. ~Kvng (talk) 06:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Clear claims of notability for company and its creator from sources currently in article. With what's available, it should remain as a company page with info on its creator included. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.