Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germany at major beauty pageants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:58, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Germany at major beauty pageants

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed two broken links to non-RS and one piece of text that formatted like a source. With no sources, this is WP:OR. There is no evidence that RS discuss this actual topic either, making it a trival intersection of data between contests. Legacypac (talk) 12:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just note Category:Nations at beauty pageants, which is populated with such lists. This should be considered a test case for the entire grouping -- or better yet, they should all be bundled into a group nom, now, for the widest discussion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. The Canada page is copy past intro and the same two busted and one fake reference. Same for the next one I checked. I'm pretty rusty at bundling AfDs and it is tough on the phone - can you do it Shawn? Legacypac (talk) 13:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This seems relevant, as all of these pages seem to use this as inclusion criteria for what constitutes a "major" beauty pageant: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Four international beauty pageants. We've also had AFDs on comparable pages before: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angola at major beauty pageants, closed as delete August 2015; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippines at major beauty pageants (2nd nomination), closed as keep Feburary 2017. postdlf (talk) 15:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & use as test case -- trivia and fancruft; no encyclopedic relevance. If this one ends deleted, then the rest in the cat can be uncontroversially PROD'ed. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I believe it meets WP:LISTPURP. I concur with North America¹⁰⁰⁰ in his comment when the article Philippines at major beauty pageants was under AfD. He stated that it’s a “functional information source and navigational aid. Deletion would force readers to click through many various articles to find the information that is summarized in the article.”--Richie Campbell (talk) 14:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 06:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as Synthesis. This article does not report from sources, it combines and represents data in a chart. Does anybody really find this useful? --Lockley (talk) 08:41, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Sulaimandaud (talk) 09:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.