Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geraldo Leite Bastos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 06:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geraldo Leite Bastos[edit]

Geraldo Leite Bastos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable parish priest. Unclear what he did to warrant an article Legacypac (talk) 05:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. The article is a very poor translation from Portuguese, but it seems he has some schools/streets named after him, and as such he dd *something* to warrant notability. Not seeing anything in English sources, but I'd strongly suggest waiting till a Portuguese speaker can review sources and offers input. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  08:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  08:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  08:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • DElete -- Nothing notable about him. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete nothing that would be particularly unique for a priest of his era. Parish priests in many areas of the world would get significant coverage in local sources like you would expect from city counselors, etc. who aren't considered notable simply because of it. I don't see anything here that suggests that he is either. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.