Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Uelmen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Uelmen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a defense attorney in the highly notable O.J. Simpson murder trial and also had an accomplished career as an academic, writer and civil servant, but there doesn't seem to be much coverage of him as an individual outside of passing mentions Prisencolin (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Some citations in GS plus legal activities. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. There's some work to be done here, for sure, but there are enough good sources around to meet notability for me. As mentioned above, he has some GS citations, and is former Dean of Santa Clara University Law School. There's enough for me to suggest he qualifies as WP:ACADEMIC. It's also worth noting that his role on O.J.'s legal team wasn't exactly minor. ERK^talk 04:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.