Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gepi mars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gepi mars[edit]
- Gepi mars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find absolutely no proof of this project. A Google search for "gepi mars" only results in false positives, and Googling for the supposed full name of the project results in two hits: the article and a mirror. Erpert (let's talk about it) 09:23, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Feezo (Talk) 10:05, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I tagged this as a hoax because it was unlikely beyond reasonable credibility and was sourced from a Science Fiction book. I nearly deleted it per {{db-hoax}} and suggest that the first uninvolved admin looking at this might want to put it out of its misery. ϢereSpielChequers 12:07, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fiction. bobrayner (talk) 13:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: please do not WP:DRIVEBY Stanisław Lem--Shirt58 (talk) 14:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find any source that mentions this anywhere. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax - the two "sources" are Lem's book of science fiction stories and Surely you're joking, Mr Feynman, a book of reminiscences. Surely you're joking, user Deebatamama! --JohnCD (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is not what Wikipedia is for. Please read WP:NOTADVOCATE. Erpert (let's talk about it) 09:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Impossible - Poland would not ever afford such a space program. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.96.120.33 (talk) 12:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.