Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geotest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geotest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. A copy/pasted version of this page was speedy deleted A7. PROD contested by author. shoy (reactions) 20:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 21:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:45, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and this should've been deleted as PROD to begin with (now we at least can lock with AfD), as this is entirely advertorial through and through, nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- sourcing does not suggest notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. A well-known name in the industry, but it still may not pass WP:CORP. Searching on "Marvin Test Solutions", the current name of the organization, might give some better sources. This and this, for example, although just press releases, might give some idea of the firm's significance. Tevildo (talk) 10:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.