Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgiana Bruce Kirby Preparatory School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep as nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete recommendations. TerriersFan (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Georgiana Bruce Kirby Preparatory School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources found to verify notability. Prod contested with "Removed prod. Consensus at AfD is that all high schools are notable." I contend that subject be considered for deletion due to the nature of it being a private, for-profit organization which completely fails all general notability tests. Not that it's a conclusive test, but Google has no news articles about the subject. I swear there's no WP:COI here, I just contend that subject doesn't meet notability guidelines. — X S G 02:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There is an error in the nomination since this is a non-profit school - see here. TerriersFan (talk) 03:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - sources are available to meet WP:N and this is a high school that educates to Grade 12. TerriersFan (talk) 03:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Could you help the article by adding some of the available sources? I looked but found nothing that would help toward WP:NOTABLE, and I'd vote to speedy keep if notability could be demonstrated. — X S G 04:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If someone could enlighten me on whether there is a proper process for abandoning an AfD, I'd like to do so. The for-profit versus non-profit nature of the subject causes me to regret having submitted it. It's also kind of embarrassing that I missed something so obvious. — X S G 14:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - no problem, I've closed it for you. TerriersFan (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.