Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgian Brazilian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carlosguitar ^{(Yes Executor?)} 19:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Georgian Brazilian[edit]

Like certain other Brazilian ethnicity articles which have been nominated recently, this article contains no actual information that could not be guessed from the title of the article. (The article had previously been submitted for proposed deletion but that was contested.) There is no indication of how many persons of Georgian descent may live in Brazil, no sources are cited, and I could not find any sources myself. I recommend that this article be deleted. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I agree with the nomination. If we have a similar article for every possible combination of two countries, we'll be swamped with something like 40,000 of these things and the vast majority of them will be, like this article, useless and content-free. Reyk _YO! 02:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am Brazilian and I say that community is not notable in my country. Zero Kitsune (talk) 04:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Agreed. User: cristo00 June 29
Delete and Cease and desist what happens when a Georgian Brazilian female and a Barbadian Brazilian male have a son? Is that a Georgian Barbadian Brazillian? And then if their son grows up and falls for the daughter of a Luxembourgian Brazilian and Croatian Brazilian (who would then be a Luxembourgian Croatian Brazilian), would their child be:
Lessie... I think that's 2 to the N power, right??? These aren't articles, they are mathematical combinations. This is rapidly becoming harmful.--Paul McDonald (talk) 06:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is the kind of thing that could, conceivably, fit in an encyclopedia if there was actually something to say about it and some sources that mention it. Right now though it's a pretty content-free piece of original research, and I don't see any reason not to delete it. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 10:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and all others like it. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't want to be waxxy, but this truly the exception that proves the rule. There isn't pages like this (those are the keywords here. like this. I am aware of others for other countries and even for Brazil itself) for any other country-ethnicity combo. Not every single possible combination needs a page. Also there's no reliable sources for notability. In fact there's no verification of this ethnicity group existing and the page is mostly OR. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 17:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails to establish notability. Punkmorten (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unworthy. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.