Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia State Route 10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 03:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia State Route 10[edit]

not relevant to an encyclopaedia, more relevant on a route-planner Helzagood 22:19, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep State route --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All in 01:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all state routes. -- Grev 01:56, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is a state route. Carioca 02:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. For the time being, precendent dictates that all roads that an American state has bothered to number are worthy of inclusion. Youngamerican 02:32, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per Youngamerican; nominator is unfamiliar with AFD guidelines. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-30 13:24Z
This is not a speedy keep. A speedy keep can only arise if the nominator withdraws or the nomination was in bad faith or disruptive. Stifle 23:54, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
comment, I do not understand why a road is relevant to an encyclopaedia? Helzagood 01:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC), if interstate roads of the states are worthy of inclusion, does the same rule extend to interstate roads in other countries?Helzagood 01:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it does. Please see Votes for deletion/Precedents. Crypticfirefly 04:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apologies, then, this article should remain. I still don't think roads are worthy of entry in an encyclopaedia, but rules are rules. 81.77.158.140 17:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete line on a map belongs on an atlas, not in an encyclopaedia. --TimPope 22:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep numbered highways. ...Scott⁵¹¹⁴ 01:53, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per precedent that we keep all like roads.Gateman1997 05:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, TimPope, but I am afraid that the rules of Wikipedia do clearly state that interstate roads in all countries are valid articlesHelzagood 19:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.