Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia Godfrey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 22:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia Godfrey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is recently created from WP:AFC after being reviewed and accepted by Fashdiva7601. I couldn't find any source with significant coverage about her, the few sources out there are either about Condoleezza Rice or George W. Bush. It unfortunately fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC without independent sources that discuss the subject in detail and not just a mention is passing. Nimuaq (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:09, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speed keep - Subject is obviously notable. a quick, and correct google search sustain this fact Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 00:34, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - To help the discussion, please show the independent sources that discuss the subject in detail and not just a mention is passing. Nimuaq (talk) 06:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - That's a search for <georgia godfrey interview>; I looked at the results, and did not spot any that are about an interview with her. – Fayenatic London 20:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think this person meets WP:GNG, at least not yet. This is the kind of government employee that tends to stay behind the curtain, and I can see no significant claim to notability either in the bio or in my research. Yes, there's plenty of hits to her name, but only because she was Rice's chief of staff, and nothing beyond that. If her career in government continues then this might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but that in and of itself does not serve to clearly establish any degree of notability. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 09:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although the article's subject had plenty of big names associated with her, this doesn't made her notable since she only made one position to the government which is Rice's chief of staff. HallelujahYeah (talk) 01:37, 05 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, falls short of WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO at the moment. – Fayenatic London 20:27, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.