Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgi Kostadinov Kostadinov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Georgi Kostadinov Kostadinov[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:23, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this artist under WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. No claims of notability made in the article. However, lacking a translation of his name into Bulgarian, language issues may be in play. Additional sources welcomed as always. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete a search turns up lots of results but looking at the first 15 pages of them there's nothing I'd class a reliable source: it seems his art is widespread on the internet but he himself is not especially remarkable. No evidence that he uses his name in Bulgarian, e.g. on his own site, from which also his impact seems local rather than international.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 00:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unable to find any significant coverage in any reliable sources. J04n(talk page) 04:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 05:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - what they said. *points up* -— Isarra ༆ 19:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He doesn't appear to have the notability in sources that an article would require. Fame, perhaps, in his field, but not actual news coverage. Silver seren^C 04:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.