Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgetown Security Studies Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Georgetown Security Studies Review[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biased author who clearly has a WP:COI when creating this article... TJH2018 talk 00:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The relevant standard here is WP:JOURNALCRIT. This doesn't seem to meet it - not even Web of Science indexes this. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 10:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 08:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent sources, and no other evidence of notability, and also promotional in character. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.