Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georges Barrière

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Georges Barrière[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to be notable based upon web searches of potential reliable web pages or books (See WP:Notability

Were some of his personal or professional activities in Indochina that were notable?
Was there something about his work that was notable (unique style, technique, or something else)?
Did he inspire artists who then became successful?--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:28, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Updates - I'm not sure if this sufficiently addresses notability, but it seems a step forward.

World War I sketches of trench life, exhbited at Societe nationale des Beaux-Arts
Won the "Prix de l"Indochine - bust of Swiss sculptor August Heng
There is mixed reception regarding his talent--CaroleHenson (talk) 14:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable enough. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 14:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable enough. I was the one who originally posted the notability / delete consideration and I think based upon the information added to the article, and links I found for his work it's notable enough. --CaroleHenson (talk) 18:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and remove the delete nomination template. It doesn't seem like there's any opposition now.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.