Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George O'Grady

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George O'Grady[edit]

Non-notable hockey player from early 1900's. Good faith attempt to create articles on all early hockey players. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 18:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Thompson (ice hockey). --Charlene 19:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, NHL is notable. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 21:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as above. Nick mallory 02:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is, I think, well settled that anyone to have played a sport on a professional or amateur basis in a major league or event is presumptively notable, even if the league or event in which he participated was not, well, quite so major at the time of his participation (toward which, see, e.g., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Baumann). For my part, I think such criterion to be appropriate, but, if one thinks it ought to be changed, a discussion might be better had at the morass that is WT:BIO rather than at an insular AfD. Joe 07:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Hockey Player for a "Proffesional League" is pretty important.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessy sir (talk • contribs) 22:17, 25 April 2007
Keep per Jahiegel. John Vandenberg 22:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.