Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Palmer (real estate developer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Palmer (real estate developer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with the basis GNG is enough but my concerns still exist, the fact he's simply getting attention from those events such as donating to politics and also his controversies, I'm not seeing how there's actually enough for substance. SwisterTwister talk 22:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Note that I am the page creator, but between his long coverage in various local news sources as a major real estate developer, and the (admittedly not as long-lasting) coverage from national news sources about his role as a major political donor in the presidential election, I think that he meets the "significant coverage" prong of GNG, and I don't think he runs afoul of any other GNG issues. Orser67 (talk) 03:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The coverage he gets clearly passes GNG. He has been covered in detail by the New York Times. Even though he is in Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Times coverage is also enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The coverage of Palmer is not just that some people do not like the way he builds housing developments. The basic fact of the matter is he has been responsible for a lot of housing development in the Los Angeles area.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's not actually helping for establishing his own convincing notability and substance. SwisterTwister talk 02:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - passes GNG, additional refs: The Guardian, LA Magazine, Reuters, Bloomberg, The Daily Beast, NYT (2000).-- Isaidnoway (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is still not meeting by what I said with my nomination, attention is only for either his political donations or his clients, none of that is substance. SwisterTwister talk 02:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- "Donald Trump’s biggest donor, giving $2m to a pro-Trump group known as Rebuilding America Now, according to Federal Election Commission data. Palmer, estimated to be worth $3bn..." suggests notability to me. Sources presented at the AfD are substantial enough to keep the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – WP:BASIC pass, per a review of available sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.