Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geodirectory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to An Post. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Geodirectory[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to have been tagged for notability for nearly ten years. In that time, the entry has alternated between a thickly promotional version and a neutral but bare version. I can't find any reliable/significant coverage. EricEnfermero (Talk) 16:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. EricEnfermero (Talk) 16:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. EricEnfermero (Talk) 16:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect - Per nom, while there are a handful of sources available, they do not seem to meet WP:NPRODUCT to the extent that this service/database/subsidiary (An Post GeoDirectory DAC) should stand independent of its owner/operator (An Post DAC). It could easily be redirected to the "subsidiaries" section of the An Post article (which could be renamed to "subsidiaries and JVs" if needed). And the very small amount of cited and non-promotional text covered there. (Otherwise just delete. As CORPDEPTH, for the standalone entity/product/subsidiary, doesn't seem to be fully met). Guliolopez (talk) 16:49, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to An Post: seeing as the topic primarily concerns postal locations, this would appear to be the best option. ww2censor (talk) 14:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.