Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoNetwork opensource
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Open Source Geospatial Foundation. WjBscribe 06:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- GeoNetwork opensource (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable software. Contested prod. MER-C 07:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I was hoping that would be a cute software pun, but it's the word we use anyway. Not notable. YechielMan 18:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Open Source Geospatial Foundation. The OSGF article is currently far from long enough to justify content forking. Lyrl Talk C 22:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all content to Open Source Geospatial Foundation as a separate section. As noted by Lyrl, there's no need to keep separate related articles of this length. -- Black Falcon 20:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have trimmed the article somewhat (see diff), so it should now be easier to merge into the OSGeo article. -- Black Falcon 21:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Would be strong keep if you can document somebody notable that uses it (for example, a national or state government agency). 38.100.34.2 22:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.