Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoArabia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Notability established. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 14:10, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GeoArabia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient evidence of notability. No sources except a listing which merely confirms its existence. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Journal is included in several selective major databases. According to the Journal Citation Reports it has the highest impact factor (2.026) of all journals in the category "Engineering, Petroleum" and in the much larger category ""Geosciences, Multidisciplinary" it still ranks in the upper third (48 out of 167). Meets WP:NJournals. I have added the foregoing IF and ranking info to the article (with ref). As an aside, it would be good if some more people could watchlist this because some (probably COI) editors are trying to insert some promotional language into the article. --Crusio (talk) 14:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Journal has over 300 hits in Google Scholar. It is continuously listed in this search engine when looking for the World's largest petroleum reservoirs, i.e. Kharaib, Shu'aiba, Khuff and Arab. The journal provides an important reference for petroleum-related research which is particularly important in times of shrinking hydrocarbon resources. --dr_geol
Keep The JCR data is enough (and all journals in JCR are in Web of Science, which is in practice our principal criterion. . DGG ( talk ) 12:42, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.