Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genrobotics (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Genrobotics[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously soft deleted, then recreated. Notability still not clearly established. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are plenty of sources to provide notability PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 23:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi PaulGamerBoy360, can you point to even one source that meets GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability? Please point to the particular para/section you believe meets CORPDEPTH/ORGIND. Thank you. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Many of the sources fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA and are press releases or churnalism. The others fail WP:ORGCRIT. Pinging Lordofhunter and HighKing who were the only two votes in the recent nomination that ended in a soft delete.--CNMall41 (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. The sources listed in the article are entirely based on announcements and/or information provided by the company/execs. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.