Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis: Apes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis: Apes[edit]

Another go-round with those "damn, dirty apes"? A single web site speculating on the possibility of a return to Dr. Zaius and company -- and a second web site quoting the article on the first web site -- doesn't really work here. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the Future films, incomplete films, and undistributed films section of Wikipedia:Notability (films). CHUD's crystal balling isn't enough to base an article on. --Onorem ♠Dil 12:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Onorem and WP:CRYSTAL —Preceding unsigned comment added by Numyht (talk • contribs) 17:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Delete Whatever is there, which isn't much, belongs in the parent article. Ooh Ooh Ooh Aah Aah Aah ChildofMidnight (talk) 09:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. The first sentence has all the information required to underscore WP:CRYSTAL when it uses the word "rumoured'. Allow back if/when filming has begun. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a crystal ball projection. Majoreditor (talk) 05:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.