Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Tullius (Skyrim)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

General Tullius (Skyrim)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicate of General Tullius, which is already up for deletion. If that is deleted, this should be as well. If not, one of the two should redirect to the other. - Sumanuil (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. - Sumanuil (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. - Sumanuil (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can't this be CSD'd under CSD A10? WP:SNOWBALL may apply here. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 05:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- It could, I guess. Just wanted to be careful. - Sumanuil (talk) 05:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The entire page all the way down to the categories is a copy-paste from the Fandom wiki page. I don't know if that counts as G12 or not; if it does then speedy G12, if it doesn't then just normal delete for non-notable video game character, per WP:NVG. Curbon7 (talk) 06:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Curbon7: it does not, because Fandom has a compatible license. Let me quickly fix the licensing issue -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 13:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Close since this has been redirected now, which seems good enough. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Given that we already have General Tullius as a redirect, there's no benefit to keeping this as a redirect given the title is a very unlikely search term. --Michig (talk) 06:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relisting, as the page was tagged for less than a day before being redirected out of process.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non notable character, unlikely search term. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 13:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect, clearly. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is not enough significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources to justify this character having a separate article. I would recommend a deletion rather than a redirect as General Tullius already exists so I do not find General Tullius (Skyrim) particularly helpful for readers. If they were typing this out in the search bar, they would already be getting the other redirect anyway. Aoba47 (talk) 19:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.