Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Maritime Corporation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Euronav. Consensus suggest that a selective merge to Euronav is an ATD for this information Joyous! Noise! 21:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

General Maritime Corporation[edit]

General Maritime Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Have tried to reseach this company, can't find anything that suggests WP:CORP or WP:CORPDEPTH. Devokewater 16:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The Wikipedia Library includes access to the extensive Miramar database of shipping articles and data. I have applied for access.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 19:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comments: I think this company is defunct. Their domain is for sale. I found information about them at company-histories.com/General-Maritime-Corporation-Company-History.html. I'm not sure that's a reliable source but they mention some article sources at the end of the page.
If they once operated 43 big Suezmax and Aframax tankers, they were certainly notable. Tonnage-wise, that's about the size of the entire French-flagged merchant fleet and bigger than Russia's. I don't know if we can find sources to prove this, though. No proof, no article (because that means we don't have enough to build a reliable article).
We can potentially use selected EDGAR data as a reliable source for article-building but only if we prove notability first.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 20:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • At the time of the bankruptcy filing the company's assets exceeded a billion dollars, and the article has (uncited) statements on the size of its fleet. At one time the entity surely was notable. Kablammo (talk) 20:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC) And the New York Times also has published a number of articles on the company. Kablammo (talk) 16:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect to Euronav. No in-depth article about this one to meet our guideline but refs to support some text in Euronav, which is notable. --A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 20:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge (selectively) into Euronav per above. By default includes redirect. Thanks for the research, A. B.! gidonb (talk) 19:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge: to Euronav if by default there is already a redirect. WonderCanada (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.