Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender polarization

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep; nominator withdrawal moluɐɯ 21:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Gender_polarization[edit]

Gender_polarization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is redundant with gender roles, and is written as an essay. Gccwang (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by nominator based on Tomwsulcer's explanation below and improvements to the article. Gccwang (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep agree there are problems with the article, including WP:ESSAY, but the concept of Gender polarization is a term in sociology in the sense that the term's coiner, Sandra Bem, is cited sufficiently. I searched several SERP pages and saw sufficient evidence that the term is in use. Gender roles is distinct from the idea of Gender polarization, the latter term describing what happens in a society when sex becomes intertwined with ideas about gender. Problem is, the current wiki-article is in sad shape; if it survives a deletion review, I'll try to fix it when I have time.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  07:43, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.