Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GenMyModel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GenMyModel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable product Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Both references in the article are primary sources. The second ref was written by Thomas Legrand a member of the dev team. Interestingly, the article was written by a new user, TomOnTheWeb, whose sole contributions have been to this article and the List of Unified Modeling Language tools page. It is possible there is a conflict of interest here, per WP:COI. I looked for independent sources and found only a blog, which is not considered reliable by Wikipedia standards. This looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON; the product has not been around long enough to garner secondary coverage in the media. While the article fails general notability WP:GNG and software notability WP:NSOFTWARE guidelines, re-creation of the article is reasonable when multiple independent reliable sources appear. --Mark viking (talk) 23:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Recent software with no coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.