Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemma O'Toole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gemma O'Toole[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ineligible for PROD as was part of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Logue and was kept but I don't think O'Toole was actually discussed at any length. She has made one solitary appearance in the W-League as a substitute. There is a long standing consensus that a player, male or female, that scrapes through WP:NFOOTY by the skin of their teeth should meet WP:GNG. Since GNG is comprehensively failed here, consensus is that it should be deleted. Spiderone 09:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 09:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - She fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Dougal18 (talk) 10:04, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, utter failure of every policy and guideline. As shown in 50+ AFDs, a male player with similar lack of accolades would also be deleted. Geschichte (talk) 10:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 13:43, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While i have no opinion on whether this article should be kept or not, it is incorrect to say she fails N:FOOTY, as the nom rightly mentioned, she scrapes through N:FOOTY, but fails GNG. HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:15, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails both GNG and our notability guidelines for footballers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.