Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gehan Rateb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gehan Rateb[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've tried, but I cannot find one non-trivial reference for this biography. She may have made the news in Arabic so happy to withdraw this nom if there is a non-trivial reference that I don't know how to find. Victuallers (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Victuallers (talk) 09:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any reliable sources for this unreferenced article that has been tagged since 2008. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - It seems like she used to be an Egyptian actress, singer, and music composer. I suggest draftifying until it's improved. However, I was unable to find reliable sources about her but added her IMDb profile in the external link section. To keep it we need reliable sources. Mommmyy (talk) 06:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Draftifying is suitable for articles with the potential for expansion, or in cases where the subject is actively developing and sources are likely to accrue shortly (such as someone with a rising career, or a company about to launch a significant product, etc). In this case, the article has existed for 13 years, and in that time, no one has located any sources. Her own website is dead and her IMDB doesn't list any credits since 2013, indicating that she may have moved away from a career in the public eye - and making it unlikely that any more content about her will emerge. Thus, deletion rather than draftification is appropriate. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. For now beacuse BLPPROD is wrong deletion tag as it has couple of external links in external links section. Please see WP:BLPPROD once. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 09:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACTOR, no significant coverage to be found. Argument about WP:BLPPROD is irrelevant since that isn't the deletion process being applied here. 144.71.77.240 (talk) 13:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.