Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gee Langdon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gee Langdon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing anything that satisfies WP:NAUTHOR, WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment After a couple of declines at AfC, @Anne Delong: appproved it in 2015, and may want to comment. PamD 15:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A book reviewed in The Listener, another reviewed in The Geographical Journal, a song which charted at #27, another recorded by Gracie Fields: I think this adds up to notability. PamD 16:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Agree with PamD.--Ipigott (talk) 07:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I added a source with a paragraph praising her analysis of historical documents. The draft article was originally declined because it was sourced to closely connected and user-contributed sources, but I fixed that before accepting at AFC. I believe having a song on the charts meets WP:MUSICBIO.—Anne Delong (talk) 01:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.