Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gdynia Redłowo railway station
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ21™ 20:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Gdynia Redłowo railway station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability, no sources. ReformedArsenal (talk) 19:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Being a railway station in one of Poland's major cities is an assertion of notability. I just added a Polish database source. Per long standing convention, rail stations are notable.--Oakshade (talk) 23:26, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:54, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Railway stations have presumed notability. I'm beginning to think that people really do not understand this "assertion of notability" thing. Articles don't have to explicitly state "this is notable". Really, they don't! Neither does an article have to have sources to be viable; it merely has to have a presumption that sources are available. -- Necrothesp (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It's as notable as any other article in Category:Railway stations served by Szybka Kolej Miejska (Tricity). To me they're about as notable as bus stops. But maybe bus stops are notable too? — Kpalion(talk) 21:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Necrothesp ("Railway stations have presumed notability"). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:40, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Necrothesp says it well - no need to repeat. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.