Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazookus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Gazookus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A dictionary definition, unprodded by article creator. Should not be transwikied; the only parts that would survive in a proper Wiktionary entry are lifted verbatim from Cassell's Dictionary of Slang. —Korath (Talk) 03:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication that the term is notable; it exists, and that's wonderful, but that's not sufficient reason to keep the article. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.