Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gazman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOLAND:

Population not reported even in the 2016 census. Ctrl+F "102206" here

See Special:Permalink/1016886834#Large batch deletion probably needed for more information. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails for lack of anything to indicate that the location is actually populated. For some reason Carlos tried to bulk this article out with a couple of additional sources, but both of them are bad (Geonet is run by the same people who run GNIS and is unreliable for the same reasons, WorldWeatherOnline is just another one of those algorithm-generated weather websites). Delete all articles like this by Carlos - it simply isn't worth doing WP:BEFORE on every single one of them when so many of them are fails, per WP:TNT. FOARP (talk) 17:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG as currrent sources are not enough. Grailcombs (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - along with all of the other 'population not reported' articles with the exact same issues Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just your typical mass-produced garbage place article about some possibly nonexistent thing in the middle of nowhere. Dronebogus (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 07:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.