Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Van Peperzeel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gavin Van Peperzeel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet NTENNIS or Tennis Project Guidelines Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nomination. Does not meet guidelines at this time. Fazzo29 (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:08, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: appears to meet WP:TENNIS. Quis separabit? 11:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE; changed my opinion thanks to explanation/elucidation by @Fyunck(click). Quis separabit? 21:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@[email protected]: In what possible way does he meet WP:TENNIS? He has never has competed in Davis Cup, Hopman Cup or World Team Cup and he has never made the main draw in a Grand Slam tournaments, the ATP World Tour Finals, ATP World Tour Masters 1000, ATP World Tour 500, or ATP World Tour 250 tournament. He never won an ATP Men's Challenger. He holds no tennis records of any kind. His highest ranking is 339. He simply is not notable at all. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What about Professional Career Finals
Singles: 5 (1-4) ?? Quis separabit? 20:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@[email protected]: Those are in the lowest level ITF future events. They are not ATP tournaments. The events are not notable because there's 600 of them. Winning 10 of them in a row is not even notable. It must be Challenger level or above per our guidelines. The professional tennis levels for men are: ITF Futures (winner gets about $1000), ATP Challenger Circuit (essentially the minor league of tennis), ATP World Tour (which has 250, 500 and 1000 levels events)... this is the tour we all see on tv. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - solid analysis by Fyunck(click).--Mojo Hand (talk) 23:19, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.